B200 vs Gaudi 3

Open Advisor →

Side-by-side GPU comparison: specs, memory, compute performance, and live cloud pricing.

Verdict

B200 has 64 GB more VRAM, making it better suited for large models and long context windows. For compute-bound workloads like training, B200 delivers 1.2× higher FP16 throughput. B200 supports a broader range of models (659 vs 649 from this catalog), giving more flexibility.

Specifications

B200Gaudi 3
VRAM192 GB128 GB
VRAM TypeHBM3eHBM2e
Memory Bandwidth8.0 TB/s3.7 TB/s
FP16 Performance2250 TFLOPS1835 TFLOPS
ManufacturerNVIDIAIntel
FP8 SupportYesYes
FP4 SupportYesNo

Price / Performance

Based on cheapest single-GPU on-demand pricing. Lower $/TFLOP = better compute value; lower $/GB = better memory value.

B200Gaudi 3
$/hr (cheapest)$5.49
$/TFLOP (compute value)$0.0024
$/GB VRAM (memory value)$0.0286

Cloud Pricing

Cheapest on-demand price per provider (single GPU).

B200

ProviderOn-demandSpotRent
RunPod$5.49/hr$3.59/hrRent
Nebius$5.50/hr$2.90/hr
Lambda$6.99/hr

Gaudi 3

No cloud pricing available.

Model Compatibility

Models from the catalog that fit on each GPU, grouped by required precision.

B200 (659 models)

Gaudi 3 (649 models)

You might also compare…

Pricing data refreshed hourly · Last updated April 11, 2026 · Browse all comparisons