H200 SXM vs M3 Ultra (192 GB)

Open Advisor →

Side-by-side GPU comparison: specs, memory, compute performance, and live cloud pricing.

Verdict

M3 Ultra (192 GB) has 3 GB more VRAM, making it better suited for large models and long context windows. For compute-bound workloads like training, H200 SXM delivers 36.4× higher FP16 throughput.

Specifications

H200 SXMM3 Ultra (192 GB)
VRAM141 GB144 GB
VRAM TypeHBM3eLPDDR5
Memory Bandwidth4.8 TB/s0.8 TB/s
FP16 Performance990 TFLOPS27 TFLOPS
ManufacturerNVIDIAApple
FP8 SupportYesNo
FP4 SupportNoNo

Price / Performance

Based on cheapest single-GPU on-demand pricing. Lower $/TFLOP = better compute value; lower $/GB = better memory value.

H200 SXMM3 Ultra (192 GB)
$/hr (cheapest)$2.35
$/TFLOP (compute value)$0.0024
$/GB VRAM (memory value)$0.0167

Cloud Pricing

Cheapest on-demand price per provider (single GPU).

H200 SXM

ProviderOn-demandSpotRent
Vast.ai$2.35/hrRent
Nebius$3.50/hr$1.45/hr

M3 Ultra (192 GB)

No cloud pricing available.

Model Compatibility

Models from the catalog that fit on each GPU, grouped by required precision.

H200 SXM (657 models)

M3 Ultra (192 GB) (657 models)

You might also compare…

Pricing data refreshed hourly · Last updated April 11, 2026 · Browse all comparisons