K80 vs RTX 4090

Open Advisor →

Side-by-side GPU comparison: specs, memory, compute performance, and live cloud pricing.

Verdict

RTX 4090 has 12 GB more VRAM, making it better suited for large models and long context windows. For compute-bound workloads like training, RTX 4090 delivers 18.9× higher FP16 throughput. At $0.18/hr vs $0.40/hr, K80 is the more cost-efficient choice for inference. RTX 4090 supports a broader range of models (566 vs 486 from this catalog), giving more flexibility.

Specifications

K80RTX 4090
VRAM12 GB24 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR5GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth0.2 TB/s1.0 TB/s
FP16 Performance9 TFLOPS165 TFLOPS
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
FP8 SupportNoYes
FP4 SupportNoNo

Price / Performance

Based on cheapest single-GPU on-demand pricing. Lower $/TFLOP = better compute value; lower $/GB = better memory value.

K80RTX 4090
$/hr (cheapest)$0.18✓ best$0.40
$/TFLOP (compute value)$0.0206$0.0024✓ best
$/GB VRAM (memory value)$0.0150✓ best$0.0167

Cloud Pricing

Cheapest on-demand price per provider (single GPU).

K80

ProviderOn-demandSpotRent
Microsoft Azure$0.18/hr$0.10/hr

RTX 4090

ProviderOn-demandSpotRent
Vast.ai$0.40/hrRent
RunPod$0.59/hr$0.29/hrRent

Model Compatibility

Models from the catalog that fit on each GPU, grouped by required precision.

K80 (486 models)

RTX 4090 (566 models)

You might also compare…

Pricing data refreshed hourly · Last updated April 11, 2026 · Browse all comparisons