K80 vs RTX A4500

Open Advisor →

Side-by-side GPU comparison: specs, memory, compute performance, and live cloud pricing.

Verdict

RTX A4500 has 8 GB more VRAM, making it better suited for large models and long context windows. For compute-bound workloads like training, RTX A4500 delivers 5.4× higher FP16 throughput. At $0.18/hr vs $0.25/hr, K80 is the more cost-efficient choice for inference. RTX A4500 supports a broader range of models (562 vs 486 from this catalog), giving more flexibility.

Specifications

K80RTX A4500
VRAM12 GB20 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth0.2 TB/s0.6 TB/s
FP16 Performance9 TFLOPS47 TFLOPS
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
FP8 SupportNoNo
FP4 SupportNoNo

Price / Performance

Based on cheapest single-GPU on-demand pricing. Lower $/TFLOP = better compute value; lower $/GB = better memory value.

K80RTX A4500
$/hr (cheapest)$0.18✓ best$0.25
$/TFLOP (compute value)$0.0206$0.0053✓ best
$/GB VRAM (memory value)$0.0150$0.0125✓ best

Cloud Pricing

Cheapest on-demand price per provider (single GPU).

K80

ProviderOn-demandSpotRent
Microsoft Azure$0.18/hr$0.10/hr

RTX A4500

ProviderOn-demandSpotRent
RunPod$0.25/hr$0.18/hrRent

Model Compatibility

Models from the catalog that fit on each GPU, grouped by required precision.

K80 (486 models)

RTX A4500 (562 models)

You might also compare…

Pricing data refreshed hourly · Last updated April 11, 2026 · Browse all comparisons