M4 (16 GB) vs RTX 3090

Open Advisor →

Side-by-side GPU comparison: specs, memory, compute performance, and live cloud pricing.

Verdict

RTX 3090 has 12 GB more VRAM, making it better suited for large models and long context windows. For compute-bound workloads like training, RTX 3090 delivers 8.5× higher FP16 throughput. RTX 3090 supports a broader range of models (566 vs 486 from this catalog), giving more flexibility.

Specifications

M4 (16 GB)RTX 3090
VRAM12 GB24 GB
VRAM TypeLPDDR5XGDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth0.1 TB/s0.9 TB/s
FP16 Performance8 TFLOPS71 TFLOPS
ManufacturerAppleNVIDIA
FP8 SupportNoNo
FP4 SupportNoNo

Price / Performance

Based on cheapest single-GPU on-demand pricing. Lower $/TFLOP = better compute value; lower $/GB = better memory value.

M4 (16 GB)RTX 3090
$/hr (cheapest)$0.25
$/TFLOP (compute value)$0.0035
$/GB VRAM (memory value)$0.0104

Cloud Pricing

Cheapest on-demand price per provider (single GPU).

M4 (16 GB)

No cloud pricing available.

RTX 3090

ProviderOn-demandSpotRent
Vast.ai$0.25/hrRent
RunPod$0.46/hr$0.22/hrRent

Model Compatibility

Models from the catalog that fit on each GPU, grouped by required precision.

M4 (16 GB) (486 models)

RTX 3090 (566 models)

You might also compare…

Pricing data refreshed hourly · Last updated April 11, 2026 · Browse all comparisons