B200 vs M3 Ultra (192 GB)

Open Advisor →

Side-by-side GPU comparison: specs, memory, compute performance, and live cloud pricing.

Verdict

B200 has 48 GB more VRAM, making it better suited for large models and long context windows. For compute-bound workloads like training, B200 delivers 82.7× higher FP16 throughput. B200 supports a broader range of models (659 vs 657 from this catalog), giving more flexibility.

Specifications

B200M3 Ultra (192 GB)
VRAM192 GB144 GB
VRAM TypeHBM3eLPDDR5
Memory Bandwidth8.0 TB/s0.8 TB/s
FP16 Performance2250 TFLOPS27 TFLOPS
ManufacturerNVIDIAApple
FP8 SupportYesNo
FP4 SupportYesNo

Price / Performance

Based on cheapest single-GPU on-demand pricing. Lower $/TFLOP = better compute value; lower $/GB = better memory value.

B200M3 Ultra (192 GB)
$/hr (cheapest)$5.49
$/TFLOP (compute value)$0.0024
$/GB VRAM (memory value)$0.0286

Cloud Pricing

Cheapest on-demand price per provider (single GPU).

B200

ProviderOn-demandSpotRent
RunPod$5.49/hr$3.59/hrRent
Nebius$5.50/hr$2.90/hr
Lambda$6.99/hr

M3 Ultra (192 GB)

No cloud pricing available.

Model Compatibility

Models from the catalog that fit on each GPU, grouped by required precision.

B200 (659 models)

M3 Ultra (192 GB) (657 models)

You might also compare…

Pricing data refreshed hourly · Last updated April 11, 2026 · Browse all comparisons