H200 SXM vs MI300X

Open Advisor →

Side-by-side GPU comparison: specs, memory, compute performance, and live cloud pricing.

Verdict

MI300X has 51 GB more VRAM, making it better suited for large models and long context windows. For compute-bound workloads like training, MI300X delivers 1.3× higher FP16 throughput. At $1.99/hr vs $2.35/hr, MI300X is the more cost-efficient choice for inference. MI300X supports a broader range of models (659 vs 657 from this catalog), giving more flexibility.

Specifications

H200 SXMMI300X
VRAM141 GB192 GB
VRAM TypeHBM3eHBM3
Memory Bandwidth4.8 TB/s5.3 TB/s
FP16 Performance990 TFLOPS1307 TFLOPS
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
FP8 SupportYesYes
FP4 SupportNoNo

Price / Performance

Based on cheapest single-GPU on-demand pricing. Lower $/TFLOP = better compute value; lower $/GB = better memory value.

H200 SXMMI300X
$/hr (cheapest)$2.35$1.99✓ best
$/TFLOP (compute value)$0.0024$0.0015✓ best
$/GB VRAM (memory value)$0.0167$0.0104✓ best

Cloud Pricing

Cheapest on-demand price per provider (single GPU).

H200 SXM

ProviderOn-demandSpotRent
Vast.ai$2.35/hrRent
Nebius$3.50/hr$1.45/hr

MI300X

ProviderOn-demandSpotRent
RunPod$1.99/hr$1.49/hrRent

Model Compatibility

Models from the catalog that fit on each GPU, grouped by required precision.

H200 SXM (657 models)

MI300X (659 models)

You might also compare…

Pricing data refreshed hourly · Last updated April 11, 2026 · Browse all comparisons