M3 Ultra (192 GB) vs MI300X

Open Advisor →

Side-by-side GPU comparison: specs, memory, compute performance, and live cloud pricing.

Verdict

MI300X has 48 GB more VRAM, making it better suited for large models and long context windows. For compute-bound workloads like training, MI300X delivers 48.1× higher FP16 throughput. MI300X supports a broader range of models (659 vs 657 from this catalog), giving more flexibility.

Specifications

M3 Ultra (192 GB)MI300X
VRAM144 GB192 GB
VRAM TypeLPDDR5HBM3
Memory Bandwidth0.8 TB/s5.3 TB/s
FP16 Performance27 TFLOPS1307 TFLOPS
ManufacturerAppleAMD
FP8 SupportNoYes
FP4 SupportNoNo

Price / Performance

Based on cheapest single-GPU on-demand pricing. Lower $/TFLOP = better compute value; lower $/GB = better memory value.

M3 Ultra (192 GB)MI300X
$/hr (cheapest)$1.99
$/TFLOP (compute value)$0.0015
$/GB VRAM (memory value)$0.0104

Cloud Pricing

Cheapest on-demand price per provider (single GPU).

M3 Ultra (192 GB)

No cloud pricing available.

MI300X

ProviderOn-demandSpotRent
RunPod$1.99/hr$1.49/hrRent

Model Compatibility

Models from the catalog that fit on each GPU, grouped by required precision.

M3 Ultra (192 GB) (657 models)

MI300X (659 models)

You might also compare…

Pricing data refreshed hourly · Last updated April 11, 2026 · Browse all comparisons